"Let's play two!"
Or, in the case of this famous photo from 1964, let's play three or four. The Mets and Giants had already played the first game of a Sunday doubleheader. The second game went twenty three innings and lasted till about 11:30PM. This prompted Bennett Cerf, a panelist on the live broadcast of "What's My Line" on CBS, to mention what was happening on another channel in New York.
This stuff doesn't pop up anymore because doubleheaders just don't exist anymore. Oh, the Dodgers and Padres played one yesterday. An actual doubleheader on this Labor Day weekend. But this was precipitated by a rare rainout in San Diego last April.
Back in the day, doubleheaders on Labor Day and other holidays were the norm in baseball. Much to the delight of the Chicago Cubs' longtime hero, the late Ernie Banks, who always wanted to "play two." This classy guy never played in a World Series game, but certainly you didn't hear a whole lot of whining from him about that. He was simply content to put on a uniform and play America's pastime from sunrise to sunset. And that included a bunch of doubleheaders in Wrigley Field, which didn't even have lights until 1988.
Of course, Ernie would be much annoyed if he was still hitching up the stirrups as an active player in 2017. Because doubleheaders as we used to know them no longer exist. Those Sunday or holiday afternoons devoted to two games, usually starting at 1PM and then winding up around 7PM. These days, the Yankees and the Red Sox usually play a single game in that same time frame. But, back then, this was one neat day at the ballpark. Tons and tons and tons of baseball. Two games for the price of one. Such a deal.
I went to a few of them when I was a kid and they were still regularly scheduled. Armed with my scorebook and a brown bag filled with two Taylor Ham sandwiches, I was neatly tucked away for a day full of memories. I craved a double bill and my father reluctantly complied for a while. I figured he saw a bargain with two games offered for the price of one ticket. Eventually, his participation fell to the hands of that dreaded four word declaration.
"Too long to sit."
My dad would ultimately adapt this time-honored phraseology into other great excuses.
"Too hot to stand."
"Too far to drive."
"Too crowded to go."
He turned it into a science. But, soon enough, I was old enough to battle them by simply going off to enjoy said event with my neighborhood friends. And that most certainly included a baseball doubleheader.
I remember a bunch of them. There was one on a long ago Independence Day when, in the first game, the Mets' Tom Seaver once again flirted with a no-hitter until the Padres' Leron Lee broke it up with one out in the ninth inning.
There was another late August one in 1984, prompted by a rainout, where the Mets swept the Padres and showed their fans that years of suffering were paying off thanks for the efforts of Dwight Gooden and Keith Hernandez.
Indeed, I go back deeper into my annals for a doubleheader I didn't attend. When the Yankees hosted the Minnesota Twins one hot Father's Day in the non-refurbished Yankee Stadium for the first ever Bat Day. Despite my pleading, that one was denied to me via a festival of Dad's excuses.
It was too hot to stand.
It was too far to drive.
It was too crowded to go.
The hat trick. What made this even more devastating to me was that the fact that most of the other kids in my crowd went. All summer long, I was the only one playing baseball without a Tom Tresh bat.
You don't get these opportunities anymore. Whereas teams used to regularly schedule seven or eight of these Sunday doubleheaders every season along with the impromptu twi-night double dips precipitated by early season rainouts, we are denied now the chance to enjoy six or seven hours of baseball for one admission. Teams now don't want to give up single games of ticket, hot dog and beer sales for the sake of playing two games for one admission. And, now, you don't even get this via a rainout.
Because, in these greediest of days, major league franchises have now discovered the wonderful financial gluttony of a day-night doubleheader. There's one game in the afternoon. Then the crowd files out, the stadium is allegedly cleaned, and then you have to buy a completely new ticket to see the game at night. Every franchise does this now. And it sucques.
Despite the double admissions, there are other financial benefits that teams enjoy as a result. A few years back, I was at the daytime first game of one of these travesties at Shea Stadium. I engaged an usher in a conversation and he also explained to me that state labor laws are constructed so that the employees do not get overtime on these days. So, essentially, they are working two games in one day, but getting less money than they would if they were attending to a traditional doubleheader. Another buck saved so we can pay that overrated fifth starter 10 million dollars a year.
Time passed and there is only an illusion of progress. We can gripe all we want, but nothing changes. I adapt my father's adage one more time.
"Too frustrated to complain."
Just don't look for a doubleheader on Labor Day.
Dinner last night: Double cheeseburger at Shake Shack.
Sunday, September 3, 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Doubleheaders were wonderful (especially the Giants-Mets one you reference; I stayed for all 32 innings and didn't go to school the next day). Of course, they were played in an era when the average game didn't run 3 hours or more.
Day-night DHs aren't doubleheaders at all. They're just a way to give the home team two chances to liberate you from your money.
Post a Comment